Implementation Challenges in Tourism-Related Green Deals: Three cases from the Intelligent Cities Challenge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70732/tijt.v34i2.72Keywords:
Tourism Development, Intelligent Cities Challenge, Partecipatory governance, Stakeholder Inclusion, European Green DealAbstract
Purpose - The European Green Deal represents the European Union's strategy to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, emphasizing decoupling economic growth from resource use and a 55% emissions reduction by 2030. The European Commission’s Intelligent Cities Challenge (ICC) is one of the initiatives implemented to support the green transition at a local level, specifically via Local Green Deals (LGDs), fostering public-private collaboration across various sectors, including tourism. Currently, no study compares the implementation challenges experienced by Italian cities from the ICC's first edition (2020-2022). This study addresses this gap through exploratory research on the final reports of the cities of Pescara, Rome, and Venice, which implemented tourism-related LGDs. The purpose is to identify the main issues encountered in involving public and private stakeholders, providing useful insights for the Italian cities participating in the second edition of the ICC and advancing understanding of sustainable tourism governance. Design/methodology/approach - Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) was used to examine the final reports from the three Italian cities (Pescara, Rome, Venice) that participated in the first edition of the ICC with a tourism related LGD. The methodology specifically adopted an open coding framework that was structured around three primary phases: (i) conceptualising, (ii) defining categories, and (iii) developing categories. Originality/value - This research uses a comparative QCA of Italian ICC tourism LGD reports, uncovering core issues like stakeholder disengagement, institutional silos, and resource shortages, previously unexamined in detail. Findings align with and confirm literature on participatory governance and green urban transitions. Future studies could scale to all European ICC cities post-second edition or evaluate intervention efficacy through longitudinal tracking. Practical implications - The findings of the study can be used by public administrations planning to involve public and private stakeholders in participative tourism governance processes. Specifically, the findings suggest that, to tackle the main issues encountered by the analysed cities in implementing their Local Green Deals, public administrations should focus on efficient stakeholders’ engagement methods, pool resources and coordinate with other public entities to avoid fragmentation and resource limitations.
References
Ateljevic, I., & Sheldon, P. J. (2022). Guest editorial: Transformation and the regenerative future of tourism. Journal of Tourism Futures, 8(3), 266–268. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-09-2022-284
Bell, K., & Reed, M. (2022). The tree of participation: A new model for inclusive decision-making. Community Development Journal, 57(4), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsab018
Broto, V. C., & Bulkeley, H. (2013). A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005
Cave, J., & Dredge, D. (2021). Regenerative tourism needs diverse economic practices. In Global tourism and COVID-19 (pp. 49–59). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1768434
Cappelli, F., Guastella, G., & Pareglio, S. (2020). Institutional fragmentation and urbanisation in the EU cities. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1800625
Ciot, M. G. (2022). Implementation perspectives for the European Green Deal in central and eastern Europe. Sustainability, 14(7), 3947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073947
Clark, J. K. (2021). Public values and public participation: A case of collaborative governance of a planning process. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(3), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020956397
Cordova-Pozo, K., & Rouwette, E. A. (2023). Types of scenario planning and their effectiveness: A review of reviews. Futures, 149, 103153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103153
El Archi, Y., Benbba, B., Kabil, M., & Dávid, L. D. (2023). Digital technologies for sustainable tourism destinations: State of the art and research agenda. Administrative Sciences, 13(8), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13080184
Fossum, K. R., Aarseth, W., & Andersen, B. (2020). Exploring scenario development—a case study of two collaborative research projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(2), 340–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-08-2018-0145
Gnaiger, A., & Schroffenegger, G. (2008). Toolkit scenario workshop. TRAMS Training and Mentoring of Science Shops, The FBI Centre.
Hagens, A., Cordova-Pozo, K., Postma, M., Wilschut, J., Zino, L., & van der Schans, J. (2022). Reconstructing the effectiveness of policy measures to avoid next-wave COVID-19 infections and deaths using a dynamic simulation model: Implications for health technology assessment. Frontiers in Medical Technology, 3, 666581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2021.666581
Hajarrahmah, D., McGehee, N. G., & Soulard, J. (2024). The road to success: Tourism social entrepreneurs’ quest for regenerative tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 108, 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2024.103818
Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J. M., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Transition versus transformation: What’s the difference? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007
Intelligent Cities Challenge. (2025). Intelligent Cities Challenge library. https://www.intelligentcitieschallenge.eu/icc-library. Last accessed on the 7th of May 2025.
Intelligent Cities Challenge. (2025). Local Green Deals. https://www.intelligentcitieschallenge.eu/local-green-deals. Last accessed on the 7th of May 2025.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis basics and techniques] (12th ed.). Beltz.
Pencarelli, T. (2020). The digital revolution in the travel and tourism industry. Information Technology & Tourism, 22(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-019-00160-3
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.
Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S., Haryono, B., Zamrudi, Z., & Praharjo, A. (2023). Challenges and successes in collaborative tourism governance: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Tourism Research, 33, 3302–3302. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v33i.2669
Simeone, L. (2012). Lesson 11: Participatory tools, the EASW methodology. In Science centres and science events: A science communication handbook (pp. 139–144). Springer Milan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2556-1_17
Sharpley, R. (2023). Sustainable tourism governance: Local or global? Tourism Recreation Research, 48(5), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2022.2040295
Streimikiene, D., Svagzdiene, B., Jasinskas, E., & Simanavicius, A. (2021). Sustainable tourism development and competitiveness: The systematic literature review. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2133
Thorn, J. P., Klein, J. A., Steger, C., Hopping, K. A., Capitani, C., Tucker, C. M., ... & Marchant, R. (2020). A systematic review of participatory scenario planning to envision mountain social-ecological systems futures. Ecology and Society, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11608-250306
Treib, O., Bähr, H., & Falkner, G. (2007). Modes of governance: Towards a conceptual clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017606061071406
Uittenbroek, C. J., Janssen-Jansen, L. B., & Runhaar, H. A. (2013). Mainstreaming climate adaptation into urban planning: Overcoming barriers, seizing opportunities and evaluating the results in two Dutch case studies. Regional Environmental Change, 13, 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0348-8
Wright, C., & Nyberg, D. (2017). An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1633–1661. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0718
Yang, Y., Wani, G. A., Nagaraj, V., Haseeb, M., Sultan, S., Hossain, M. E., ... & Shah, S. M. R. (2023). Progress in sustainable tourism research: An analysis of the comprehensive literature and future research directions. Sustainability, 15(3), 2755. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032755
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luca Olivari, Luca Giraldi, Guido Capanna Piscè

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.